<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>BL Talk - EP 078: Are MAPs Trying to "Sexualize" Children?</title>
        <link>https://fstube.net/videos/watch/87b05a78-116f-4eb4-89d5-83d0e3f8d883</link>
        <description>SUMMARY:  Out of all the many things that MAPs are unfairly demonized for, one of the worst of all is the belief that they want to "sexualize" children. Society, of course, promotes the idea that kids are innocent, wholesome and pure -- precisely because they are sex-less. The notion is that sex -- adult sexuality, at least -- is a vice, a corrupting, harmful element that robs children of their "purity" and selfishly forces the derogatory qualities of human sexuality on them before they are ready. HOST: Zoomzoom4 PANEL: aboysXO, Lennon72, Omahapup99, Zoltan, Wolfrunner LENGTH: 45:32 DATE: 07/02/26</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 06:28:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
        <generator>PeerTube - https://fstube.net</generator>
        
        <copyright>All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified in the terms specified at https://fstube.net/about and potential licenses granted by each content's rightholder.</copyright>
        <atom:link href="https://fstube.net/feeds/video-comments.xml?videoId=87b05a78-116f-4eb4-89d5-83d0e3f8d883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[BL Talk - EP 078: Are MAPs Trying to "Sexualize" Children? - mrnotamoose]]></title>
            <link>https://fstube.net/w/hKPiFVFKG9TNJQ4V7izRwt;threadId=25981</link>
            <guid>https://fstube.net/w/hKPiFVFKG9TNJQ4V7izRwt;threadId=25981</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 19:02:58 GMT</pubDate>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Eivind Berge who today highlighted the following extract from <a href="http://angryharry.mra-archive.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">angryharry.mra-archive.com</a>:</p>
<p>"As any normal woman will tell you; children were designed to be hugged and cuddled. They were designed, by Nature, to elicit caring and loving behaviours in the adults around them. The lineages of children who were not designed this way did not make it down the years. They were statistically washed away by those that were. And adults who failed to respond appropriately to the children around them experienced the same fate…</p>
<p>Of course, we know that some tiny percentage of adults and children around us are not particularly normal in these respects but, on balance, the vast majority of both men and women do not behave in a manner that is likely to hurt children - on the contrary, they mostly do the exact opposite - and the vast majority of children can also usually wheedle their way most happily around the psychology of the adults that surround them…</p>
<p>The notion that children are necessarily damaged for life solely by engaging in consensual sexual fondling is as risible as is the notion that a man who has failed to withdraw from his long-term partner when she has lost the mood is committing an act that is akin to murder - which is what 'rape' is often nowadays deemed to be. And the alleged lifelong psychological damage that is said to occur as a result of such things is nothing more than a malevolent myth that has been fuelled by the feminists and the abuse industry for the usual reasons.</p>
<p>Indeed, given the horrible and dangerous world in which our human ancestors have had to survive over the millennia, the idea that evolution arranged matters so that cuddles and caresses give rise to some kind of permanent psychological disability is utterly preposterous. Indeed, a more preposterous notion is difficult to imagine. And millions of people know this - but they are too scared to say so lest they be accused by the malicious witch-hunters of 'defending paedophiles'.</p>
<p>Loosely speaking, when it comes to intimates - whether involving children or not - the justice system is nowadays mostly attracting accusations only from those who are imbued with hatred - or, perhaps, with greed."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            <dc:creator>mrnotamoose</dc:creator>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>