<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>[French] The Queen v Robin Sharpe 2001 {1/4} [Canada's child pornography law]</title>
        <link>https://fstube.net/videos/watch/cb284d1f-8cca-4ddd-b4c1-d4ea2ace0131</link>
        <description>The court hears arguments in case #27376, The Queen v. John Robin Sharpe, on January 18, 2001. The court is being asked to decide whether the possession of child pornography is constitutionally protected as a form of expression in Canada. The case arose as a result of the British Columbia Court of Appeal’s acquittal of John Robin Sharpe of child pornography possession charges because the court deemed charges for simple possession of such material to be unjustifiable under the Constitution. Lawyer John Gordon presents arguments on behalf of the Crown. Lawyer Cheryl Tobias presents arguments on behalf of the Attorney General of Canada, an intervener in the case. Jim Flaherty presents arguments on behalf of the Attorney General of Ontario, an intervener.</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 13:00:58 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
        <generator>PeerTube - https://fstube.net</generator>
        
        <copyright>All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified in the terms specified at https://fstube.net/about and potential licenses granted by each content's rightholder.</copyright>
        <atom:link href="https://fstube.net/feeds/video-comments.xml?videoId=cb284d1f-8cca-4ddd-b4c1-d4ea2ace0131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    </channel>
</rss>